Let me put it this way. As a sniper i move from vantage point to vantage point, rain covers my footsteps when i'm sprinting from place to place. it also masks my shots so its harder to grasp my position. Lastly its easier for me to see players through the rain with a scope than it is for them with sights and normal vision.
Therefore during rain the combat dynamic changes for certain styles. Which is a good tactical game mechanic. Therefore i voted to keep rain.
Thanks,
Dan
I can vouch for DanielPx experiencing the bug, and can also vouch for his honesty... but as he said i wasn't there a the time to know his exact inventory. I know what he usually carries around with him is ballpark $1500 in game cash worth of inventory because it is the same as mine. Putting odd junk aside i would say a refund of $1000 would cover the important items. And if a partial refund is considered i would say - since no photographic inventory evidence would be proven, and the sad truth that sometimes bugs do cause the loss of inventory (with no fault of the server) a $500 refund would be fair - if any refund is given.
Thanks,
Daniel
What if you had a loadout at the start of each round, with a limited amount of items (4 or something) including weapon attachments. This would still mean its important to gather items and guns around the map. And along with this maybe some starting xp. Not much but enough to make a small difference what you upgrade. Again this would still mean its important to kill players to get a level advantage.
Thanks,
Dan
As much as i disagree with the actions of this player, I have myself previously said i got my "hacks" from a ridiculously obviously fake website after being accused of hacking (http://www.cheaphacksfromchina.com or something along those lines). For this reason and having seen other people do this as a joke too i would not put his case under: "advertising".
I would only look at his ban as a case of spam and consider his appeal accordingly.
And thus for me i think his appeal is valid - and think his ban should be lifted. But the decision isn't up to me.
Thanks,
Dan
Again, that is not a glitch. That is a game mechanic - cars and vehicles have collision physics. And when you buy a vehicle it spawns in front of you a bit into the air. Players can use that to push other vehicles out of the way. Until nelson changes the way the game works this will stay the same.
BUT - as i said; if this does not seem fair to you then please make a post in the suggestions forum about the safety of vehicles parked on the liberator.
Thanks,
Dan
[This matter has been thus far resolved and the thread is now closed]
Most of the Sandbox servers are still first person only. Only servers like 1-4, 1-3 and some others are both.
Makes sense, i only play on 1-4. Pinstar disregard the information about sandbox servers from my first post, and refer to @Acid's post.
Thanks,
Dan
To my knowledge, sandbox remained 1st and 3rd person throughout. Only the survival servers became 1st person ONLY. But about a week ago it they all reverted back to the ORIGINAL 1st and 3rd person modes. I may be wrong about the sandbox staying 1st/3rd but as of NOW: sandbox and survival are BOTH 1st and 3rd person.
Thanks,
Dan
Cryptic Honeybadger. And darkheart is the coolest but its expensive, and ive had aftermath for my grizzly for a long time so i find it kinda boring. Thats why i use the orange tiger skin for the ekho. Although i think the new-ish accelerator ekho skin isnt bad. Same with the foxtail honeybadger.
Thanks,
Dan
It is entirely possible to destroy vehicles in the safe zone, without hacking or breaking any rules. They can be shot from the outside, or blown up with charges (placed on a vehicle and flown-sailed into the area). And vehicles can be bought within the safe zone. chris1thanatos can you please confirm that anything else other than those two things was done? Otherwise no rules were broken here.
If you disagree with these rules please make a new thread in the "suggestions" Forum and we can discuss it.
Thanks,
Dan
Playing on sandbox 1-4 today everyone was encountering an invisible player - i told them all to reconnect (most of them did) and it was still happening. I walked around and found a player "steve the thief" floating naked above a spawn point, not moving, and invulnerable. I then proceeded to reconnect multiple times and each time he was still there. Either this is a player only (client side) bug or it is something which can be "turned on" at will. This player shows up in the player list. But never types. And when i tried to kick him, it says player not found.
This is currently proving a huge problem on the sandbox server.
Thanks,
Dan
How about this, most of what you guys have said is valid - currently... ive been on a sandbox dry spell while i got addicted to survival, ill go back to sandbox regularly. From 0. no expectations and no titles. Lets see if i can earn the title amongst you guys aswell.
As for "the best sniper wouldnt need them to slow down"... no sniper can predict some1 juking back and forth to avoid bullets. its just Luck at that point. I wait for a pause or more regular movement before taking a shot. And as far as camping on trees goes, i cant even remember the last time i camped on a tree... we cant have encountered each other often and im sure that "tree combat" was a one off keanu.
Once ive been back on the grind for a while you can make your decision, and whether you think im the best at that point or not (AND WERE NOT TALKING ABOUT BEST PLAYER.... no way near, just sniper - aka better than some1 else in my position....) you will see im not pulling blanket statements out of my ass :).
One of the mos dangerous I met was BartBart1220. He doesnt really play much anymore though.
Im in barts team. yeh he doesnt play much anymore, spends his time on DayZ. But without trying to be cocky (even though i probably am a bit :P), i think im the best sniper on unturned. This opinion is agreed by bart, bella, and Andicapped - was no.1 on 2 of freezzers survival servers. And being the best sniper on a sandbox server means i basically out-gun absolutely every1. I dont go into close combat range often; and if i do its usually people coming to me - which means im prepaired.
yah, 
Dan
forgot about the gasmask yeh pretty much identical.
cargo shorts are cooler! they go better with the alice pack.
Neither. I ALWAYS use a combo:
Cargo pants,
Spec ops vest
Military helmet
Thief top.
Alice pack.
IF YOU WANNA BE COOL LIKE ME, use that :P.
Best combination of carrying space and protection.
Thanks,
Dan
maybe if you add a way of changing the price of one of your market items, without removing it.
Then you could implement a 1 week fix. Within that time you cant remove an item from the market. Hence removing the accessibility of using it as a vault.
Thanks,
Dan
Maplestrike = ridiculous positive KD. Matamorez sounds like a pigeon pooping out pellets. Just saying.
Dan
The poll will influence the decision of the outcome. The admins can choose to ignore it or not, but its good to have some public opinion.
Thanks,
Dan
Alles anzeigenIt's just easier to play and the gap between low skill and high skill will become smaller.
I know some ppl will disagree if I say it is a shooter but for me it is.
Think about Counter-Strike or Battlefield in 3rd person.
They don't have it because there is a reason.
Good ppl stand out so much more with 1st person and I think that is the reason some ppl want 3rd person back. They can't handle a lose against a real good player.
I'm talking about the medium skilled ppl which tell you storys about how good they are.
It feels like 80% of the players I've talked with on freezzer are 100% sure they are the best player in the world and if they lose, the enemy was a hacker, it's cause of 1st person, you get flamed because, for example, the weapons you use or any other excuse. Most ppl are so cocky and mad. If you kill them they are going to hate you forever.
I'm so out of topic. I'm sorry
Its quite the opposite, good players are sooooo much better with 3rd person. Take it from myself, and most of the players out there... you only learn to use 3rd person effectively after your already experienced. 1st person gives an even playing field. Good players mostly shoot in 1st person anyway so giving them 3rd person back only gives them more options.
but at the end of the day opinions are opinions, the poll is what counts,
Thanks,
Dan
3rd person is pretty bad.
You can stand behind a wall and place the muzzle of your rifle outisde of the wall, making you able to kill while remaining in cover and invisible.
It's unfair, it promotes hardcore camping.
Not entirely accurate, if you can shoot past a wall someone can shoot you. same in 1st person as 3rd person. However i do agree, it promotes camping.
Thanks,
Dan
